Yet another judge rules against Trump’s immigration ban

However, also on Friday, in yet another related case, a federal judge in MA declined to renew a temporary restraining order, which is set to expire on Sunday.

Sign up to our daily newsletter for your chance to win.

A U.S. appeals court has rejected the Trump administration’s request to immediately reinstate its travel ban barring citizens from seven mainly Muslim countries and temporarily banning refugees.

The judge’s temporary restraining order represents a major challenge to Trump’s action, although his administration could still appeal the ruling and have the policy upheld.

A federal judge in Seattle brought the Trump administration’s executive order on immigration to a halt nationwide Friday, issuing a temporary restraining order in U.S. District Court until further hearings can be held.

Throughout Saturday, Trump criticized Robart for his ruling.

In addition, a State Department official told CNN that the cancellation of visas that were “provisionally revoked” after the order has been reversed, as long as they weren’t marked as cancelled.

President Trump did not take the news of Judge Robart’s decision as well, as evidenced by his petulant Twitter rants.

This article will be updated.

The US president’s executive actions on extreme vetting and visa ban apply to migrants, refugees and US legal residents – Green Card holders – from Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Syria, Libya and Yemen. During the presidential campaign, Trump called out Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s “Mexican heritage” after the Indiana-born judge ruled against him during the litigation over alleged wrongdoing at Trump University.

Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban on people from seven mainly-Muslim countries will remain suspended after a U.S. court rejected his administration’s appeal.

A Virginia judge on Friday will consider whether to allow that state’s attorney general to intervene in another court challenge there. The order prompted massive protests around the country and at least four states filed lawsuits.

The U.S. Department of Justice will now seek an emergency stay for the executive order, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said Friday night. But thousands of people holding proper visas, as well as Oxfam America and other social service and advocacy organizations, continue to have their constitutional rights violated by the continuation of this executive order.